Key Point: Glock 26 Gen4 is the better handgun.
A couple days ago my father-in-law and I met with one of his old friends at his personal shooting range. He showed us his collection — among which is a Chinese-made https://gunnewsdaily.com/rich-history-behind-legendary-ar-15-rifle/“>AK-47 clone (the brand is called Norinco), a Rock Island Armory 1911-style pistol chambered in https://gunnewsdaily.com/handgun-caliber-guide/“>.22 TCM, a Glock 26 Gen4 and an obscure semi-auto pistol that looked so beaten up I didn’t bother checking it out.
This first appeared in 2018 and is being reposted due to reader interest.
What caught my attention was his newest acquisition: a subcompact S&W M&P9 , which he said was the second generation of the https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-43-vs-mp-shield/“>M&P line of pistols from Smith & Wesson. I was like wow, it looks like a Glock and it also has “generations” — just another Glock rip-off!
In the past I’ve been very vocal about how I don’t like plastic guns. I was brought up shooting only all-steel 1911s and revolvers and I just don’t like them, so I don’t think there’s anything special about this Glock clone.
Also, while I love S&W magnum revolvers (specifically the pre-lock ones) and I’m a huge fan of Jerry Miculek, I don’t like Smith & Wesson as a firearms manufacturer company — and I don’t think I have to explain why as it’s https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/html/20000317_2.html” target=”_blank”>common knowledge (at least among gun rights advocates). So why am I even writing this article?
I think Glocks are ugly, and this Glock-ish clone from Smith & Wesson isn’t a beauty queen either — it does look a bit more proportional compared to the Glock 26, but an officer-size 1911 is just miles away from both in the aesthetics department. I just don’t like plastic guns in general.
This isn’t something I should be busying myself with.
Well, I’m writing this because my father-in-law and that friend of his had an hour-long argument over which pistol is better, the former swears by the M&P9 M2.0 because he thinks it’s easier to conceal and has, among other things, better ergonomics (and like me he doesn’t like Glocks too).
His friend thinks the M&P M2.0 is a great acquisition but Glocks are the be-all and end-all of plastic handguns being they were they were the first (he obviously hasn’t heard of the H&K VP70 but technically he’s right — Glock made plastic handguns the phenomenon that they are today), which makes Glock the authority. That, and https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-19-gen-3-vs-glock-19-gen-4/“>Glocks are reliable and perfect, etc.
Whatever one argued, the other had a counter-argument to. Needless to say, they got nowhere.
I’m hoping that by doing research and giving them (and our readers who might be considering getting either of these two pistols as a https://gunnewsdaily.com/best-concealed-carry-guns/“>CCW piece) a non-biased handgun enthusiast’s perspective (I don’t like both, which makes me non-biased), I could help out a little.
Get Deals on Guns and Tactical Gear
Join 70,000 Readers For Our Weekly Discounts
GET MY DISCOUNTS
Table of Contents
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#The_Tale_of_the_Tape“>1 The Tale of the Tape
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#The_Glock_26_Gen4“>2 The Glock 26 Gen4
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#The_SW_Shield_MP9_M20_Su…“>3 The S&W Shield M&P9 M2.0 Subcompact
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Dimensions“>4 Dimensions
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Accuracy“>5 Accuracy
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Handling“>6 Handling
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Durability“>7 Durability
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Ease_of_Maintenance“>8 Ease of Maintenance
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Caliber_Conversions“>9 Caliber Conversions
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Pricing“>10 Pricing
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Customer_Support“>11 Customer Support
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Which_one_is_better_then“>12 Which one is better then?
- https://gunnewsdaily.com/glock-26-vs-shield-m2/#Conclusion“>13 Conclusion
THE TALE OF THE TAPE
https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-…” srcset=”https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 1277w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 600w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 300w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 768w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 1024w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 696w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 1068w, https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-and-SW-MP9-… 1071w” width=”1277″ />
|Glock 26 Gen4||S&W Shield M&P9 M2.0 Subcompact|
|Caliber: 9mm||Caliber: 9mm|
|Overall Length: 163mm / 6.41 in.||Overall Length: 154.94mm / 6.2 in.|
|Height: 106 mm / 4.17 in.||Height: 114.3 mm / 4.5 in.|
|Width: 30 mm / 1.18 in.||Width: 30 mm / 1.18 in.|
|Barrel Length: 87 mm / 3.42 in.||Barrel Length: 79 mm / 3.1 in.|
|Weight with empty mag: 615 g. / 21.71 oz.||Weight with empty mag: 518.8 g. / 18..3 oz.|
|Frame Material: Polymer||Frame Material: Polymer|
|Slide Material: Steel||Slide Material: Stainless Steel|
|Finish: Melonite||Finish: Armornite|
|Action: “safe action” DAO, striker-fired||Action: DAO, striker-fired|
|Barrel Rifling: Polygonal (octagonal), 1/9.84″ twist||Barrel Rifling: Lands-and-grooves, 1/10″ twist|
|Magazine Capacity: 10 (optional 15/17/33)||Magazine Capacity: 7, 8|
|Bore axis: 32mm / 1.26 in.||Bore axis: ?|
If you went through all the figures on the table above you probably noticed that the bore axis measurement for the M&P9 is missing. That’s because I searched everywhere online, even talked to a certain Wayne from Smith & Wesson’s customer service, but I got nothing. More on this later.
THE GLOCK 26 GEN4
https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-Gen4-e15227…” width=”500″ />
In 1995 Glock began production of the models Glock 26 and Glock 27. Both are pretty much the same https://gunnewsdaily.com/best-pocket-pistols/“>subcompact pistols with the only difference between them being their calibers — the former is chambered for the weaker but faster 9mm while the latter is chambered for the stronger but slower .40 S&W.
A year later, both pistols were introduced in the US and they’ve become some of the most popular plastic guns on the market since.
All Glock subcompacts share the same defining physical attribute: they have a short fat grip and a short slide, i.e. they’re all ugly as sin (to me at least). Other than their appearance, they work pretty much like their bigger https://gunnewsdaily.com/best-compact-9mm/“>compact and full-size brothers — they’re all reliable.
And that Glock pistols are reliable is a gross understatement — as discussed in all the previous rounds of our series of these Handgun Showdown write-ups, they’ve been tortured to hell and back, and back to hell and back. They never stop working.
https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Glock-26-Gen4-Tortur…” width=”500″ />
The Glock 26 is no exception. Just skim through these Google results and you’ll see why, and while you’re at it, maybe you’d want to read what http://www.defensivecarry.com/forum/firearm-cleaning-maintenance/113622-…” target=”_blank”>this guy did to his. I mean I’d sooner drive a bulldozer over my 1911 — we all know what saltwater does to metal.
I don’t like Glocks as far as aesthetics and I’ve said that a number of times before, but I can understand why there are people who love them so much. It’s because of their legendary reliability.
I personally wouldn’t hesitate to buy one and carry it on my person if I didn’t have my trusty custom 1911 https://gunnewsdaily.com/best-edc-gear/“>EDC — then again I don’t really like the 9mm that much either so I’d really go for something like a http://www.para-usa.com/firearms/expert/warthog.html” target=”_blank”>Para Ordnance Warthog in .45 ACP.
THE S&W SHIELD M&P9 M2.0 SUBCOMPACT
https://gunnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SW-MP9-M2.0-e1522794…” width=”500″ />
It was in 2012 when Smith & Wesson introduced the first of their M&P Shield line of plastic handguns and it really gave all their plastic-handgun-manufacturing competitors (the biggest of which being Glock) a run for their money.
In the next three years they would produce more than a million of these pistols. Who knows how many more of these were produced fast forward three more years to today? And there’s one good reason for the M&P Shield’s rise in popularity: it screams value through and through.
While these weren’t nearly as reliable as Glocks as these guys from the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okqt1_GVW5s” target=”_blank”>Military Arms Channel on YouTube demonstrated from their routine torture tests of sorts, the M&P Shield offered better sights (any factory steel sights on a handgun is better than Glock’s plastic sights in my opinion), better ergonomics and a rather intrusive but newbie-friendly loaded chamber indicator, among other things.
Time for a Duel: Smith & Wesson’s M2.0 vs. Glock 26 is written by Gun News Daily for nationalinterest.org